![]() ![]() That 25.12☌ temperature for January 2000 was warmed up to 25.21☌. (-9999 means that no reading was recorded.)īelow that table in red is the official NOAA temperature data, where two things stand out.ġ) NOAA has adjusted the actual Raw data. In February 2000 the average temperature was 25.50° Celsius. Therefore, the average temperature in January 2000 was 25.12° Celsius. The 12 numbers that follow are the 12 average monthly temperatures for that station, shown as Celsius x 100. Each row represents a year, for instance the first year is 2000. In blue is the actual Raw data produced by the Belle Glade station until it went dark in 2005. The table immediately below from the Belle Glade station is much simpler to read than it looks, and it reveals both types of fraud that NOAA is committing: 1) the adjustment of temperature data and 2) the fabrication of temperature data. As I’ll show in just a moment, aside from the fabricated reports from the USHCN ghost stations, NOAA adjusts the actual readings from stations that are still functioning, to support the climate hoax. In other words, the temperature records for approximately 1/3 of the USHCN stations are fabricated estimated. NOAA has chosen to keep the number of database inputs at 1,218.Īs a result, NOAA simply estimates the temperature data for the other 388 decommissioned stations.By 2020 the number of functioning stations had declined to 830.At one point in the 1950s there were 1,218 of these stations.Here is some background on the USHCN stations: NOAA simply “estimates” the Belle Glade temperature, and then inputs that into their formula that reports “Hottest Year Ever!” They call this “science.” It’s not. It was removed in 2005, but that hasn’t stopped NOAA from continuing to ascribe temperature data from the Belle Glade station into their climate record. In the picture below, John Shewchuk is standing where US Historical Climatology Network (“USHCN”) station 080611 once stood in Belle Glade, FL. They might have been removed, or maybe they just quit operating and were never repaired, but NOAA continues to fabricate estimate temperature data for these formerly operational stations. Meteorologist John Shewchuk has been researching NOAA’s hundreds of “ghost stations.” These are climate stations that were once in operation, but aren’t any longer. With only 9 months of reporting data, NOAA was already able to announce “Hottest Year Ever.” But to be fair, they knew well in advance that their data would show 2023 to be the hottest year ever, not only because NOAA “adjusts” much of the data they gather, but even more shockingly, because they fabricate much of the rest of the data inputs from decommissioned stations! “2023 Shaping Up to Be Warmest Year in NOAA's Global Climate Record” NovemMORNING RANT: The Hottest year Ever? NOAA is Including Fabricated Data from Hundreds of Decommissioned Stations in Its Temperature DatabaseĪs is customary every autumn, there is a torrent of news stories coming out about the current year being the Hottest Year Ever! Since these stories start coming out well before the end of the year, that pretty much gives the game away about how fraudulent the data inputs are. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |